Courting Harry Looks at a Friendship Destroyed By the Supreme Court at History Theatre

Pearce Bunting, John Middleton, Bonni Allen, Jonathan Feld, EJ Subkoviak, Eva Gemlo Photo by Rick Spaulding

Courting Harry is my second show of the weekend dealing with constitutional law, which is an odd coincidence, right? Like What the Constitution Means to Me, this play has taken on new meaning in the short time since it premiered thirteen years ago. Several moments land differently now, particularly those dealing with Roe v. Wade, which has been overturned since the play’s debut. Another comes when Warren Burger comments on maintaining decorum and societal standards, things we’ve all watched erode over the past decade.

If you read my review of What the Constitution Means to Me and are worried I’m about to go off the deep end again, I promise I’ll try to stick to the production this time.

Courting Harry, by Lee Blessing, is adapted from Linda Greenhouse’s book on Supreme Court Justice Harry Blackmun. It focuses on his lifelong friendship with Warren Burger, whom he met in kindergarten in St. Paul. The two remained close for decades, but their relationship soured when they found themselves serving together on the Supreme Court, increasingly on opposite sides of the Court’s decisions.

Director Joel Sass, who also serves as set designer, as he often does at Open Eye Theatre, where he is the Artistic Director, stages the action in a kind of afterlife. Blackmun and Burger narrate the story in the first person, surrounded by shelves of bankers boxes containing everything Blackmun ever wrote. These boxes, which Greenhouse used as the basis for her book, become the source material for the play itself. From them, the two men pull notes, drafts, and letters, reconstructing, and arguing over, the details of their relationship.

It’s an engaging story about two kids from St. Paul who made good and went on to shape American society in profound ways. Pearce Bunting as Warren Burger and John Middleton as Harry Blackmun capture the rhythms of a lifelong friendship, the interruptions, the shorthand, the casual needling, and the deeper tensions underneath it all.

History Theatre once again makes history feel immediate and human by telling it through people rather than just facts. There’s a lingering sense that these men might have wished they’d chosen a different path, one that would have allowed them to remain friends. The play reminds us that Supreme Court justices are, first and foremost, people. They were once children; they have families and friendships; and like all of us, they have made, and lost, relationships over their beliefs.

Courting Harry runs through June 7th at the History Theatre in St. Paul. For more information and to purchase tickets go to https://www.historytheatre.com/2025-2026/courting-harry

The Stages of MN delivered straight to your inbox. It’s the best way to make sure you never miss out on the theater action. To subscribe on a computer, enter your email address on the home page (right-hand side) and click subscribe. On mobile, scroll to the bottom of the page to find the same option. You can also follow me on Facebook @thestagesofmn and on Instagram thestagesofmn.

The Stages of MN YouTube channel is home to the Stages of MN Show. You can watch it by clicking here. Be sure to check out the latest episodes and subscribe so you’ll always know when a new one drops. Not sure you agree with one of my takes? I’m also part of the Twin Cities Theater Bloggers (TCTB), where you can find review roundups from my colleagues and me. Follow us on Facebook at @TwinCitiesTheaterBloggers.

What the Constitution Means to Me is a Sobering Experience at Artistry

Mackynzie Ganbaatar and Stephanie Cousins Photo by Alyssa Kristine Photography

What the Constitution Means to Me is a relatively recent play, written, I imagine, in response to the first Trump administration by Heidi Schreck. In some ways, it’s a memory play, drawn from Schreck’s experience competing in constitutional debate competitions to earn college money. But as the piece progresses, the character of Schreck sheds her 15-year-old self, and the performance shifts into something more direct, more urgent, as she speaks as her adult self.

Much of the show focuses on women’s rights and abortion, but it also touches on immigration and broader questions of who the Constitution actually protects. Watching it now, it’s hard not to feel that if it were written today, it would go even further, because things have gone even further.

There’s a moderator, played here by Dan Hopman, and at the end the structure breaks open. The actor playing Schreck, Stephanie Cousins, drops the role, introduces herself, and brings out a local student debater. They argue whether the Constitution should be abolished, with an audience member serving as the final judge.

It’s sobering. It’s powerful. It’s deeply thought-provoking.

Or at least it was in 2018.

Now, with the benefit, or burden, of everything that’s happened since, it lands differently. Not while you’re watching it. Schreck’s script is laced with humor; it’s engaging, even disarming in the moment. The weight hits later, on the drive home, or when you sit with it. Or, in my case, when you’re asked to be the judge and actually decide.

Both sides make compelling arguments. But as I stood there considering them, I had a sinking realization: it doesn’t matter.

I used to think, naively, that our political divide was about different ideas of what’s best for the country. I was raised in the Christian faith, and thus I aligned myself with Democrats, as they are clearly the party of compassion. Even in high school, I couldn’t reconcile that with what I saw from Republicans. The hypocrisy was obvious to me at fourteen. I never understood how so many people couldn’t see it.

I understand now. People see what they want to see, especially when it gives them permission to believe or do terrible things.

But even after realizing that, I still believed there were guardrails. That the Constitution would ultimately protect us.

It took Trump, someone who doesn’t even pretend otherwise, to shatter that illusion. Someone who openly operates in his own self-interest, who uses power to enrich himself and those around him. A man with no moral compass, a convicted sexual assaulter, and worse. Someone who installs loyalists and media personalities into positions of power precisely because they will do what he says. Someone who, every time he speaks, demonstrates his disregard for the Constitution itself.

And nothing happens.

That’s the realization that settles in: the Constitution doesn’t protect us. It protects those who know how to manipulate it. Those who twist it. And when they can’t, they ignore it, and still, nothing happens. It becomes a tool to maintain power, not to check it.

So I voted to abolish it.

But even that feels futile. Because who writes the new Constitution? The same people who benefit from the current one. The same power structures. The same imbalance.

If this sounds like I didn’t like the show, that couldn’t be further from the truth. I loved it. I think everyone should see it.

But it forces you to think, and right now, thinking leads to some very dark places. Maybe this is just what it means to finally grow up politically: to recognize that the country doesn’t stand for what it claims to stand for. Maybe it never did. And when you see how many people continue to support all of this, it’s hard to believe it ever could.

I don’t know how you overcome that level of willful ignorance and/or evil.

And yet… if there is a way forward, it probably starts with exactly this kind of conversation. With work like this. With people sitting in a room together and actually engaging with these questions.

What the Constitution Means to Me runs through June 7 at Artistry in Bloomington. For more information and tickets go to https://artistrymn.org/constitution

The Stages of MN delivered straight to your inbox. It’s the best way to make sure you never miss out on the theater action. To subscribe on a computer, enter your email address on the home page (right-hand side) and click subscribe. On mobile, scroll to the bottom of the page to find the same option. You can also follow me on Facebook @thestagesofmn and on Instagram thestagesofmn.

The Stages of MN YouTube channel is home to the Stages of MN Show. You can watch it by clicking here. Be sure to check out the latest episodes and subscribe so you’ll always know when a new one drops. Not sure you agree with one of my takes? I’m also part of the Twin Cities Theater Bloggers (TCTB), where you can find review roundups from my colleagues and me. Follow us on Facebook at @TwinCitiesTheaterBloggers.